Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of waterproofing systems for wet zones in buildings, examining the performance of cement-based, polymer-modified, and combined waterproofing membranes under different operational conditions. The research synthesizes field observations from swimming pools, hotel bathrooms, and commercial kitchen installations in the Czech Republic over the period 2018–2024, combined with an analysis of 122 documented defect cases. The primary objective was to evaluate waterproofing system durability depending on material type, application environment, and compliance with technological protocols. Results demonstrate that two-component polymer-modified cement membranes achieve optimal performance across diverse environments, with 97.8% defect-free area in hotel bathrooms and 94.6% in swimming pools at 24-month observation. Single-component cement systems showed adequate results only in intermittent water exposure conditions, with 8.8 percentage point performance reduction under constant immersion. Polyurethane-based waterproofing proved essential for chemically aggressive environments, eliminating the 12% failure rate observed with cement membranes at commercial kitchen drain perimeters. The study quantified the impact of technological protocol adherence: installations with full compliance achieved 2.1% defect rate versus 41.2% for significant violations at 24 months. Substrate moisture exceeding 2.5% correlated with 78% of membrane delamination cases, while shortened waterproofing curing time (<24 hours) accounted for 23.4% of all documented failures. A four-checkpoint quality control protocol reduced defect rates by 76% and rework costs by 85%, delivering 380% return on investment. Practical recommendations include specification of 2K polymer-cement waterproofing for swimming pools with a minimum 48-hour curing, polyurethane substitution at drain perimeters in commercial kitchens, and mandatory moisture verification below 2.0% threshold before membrane application. The findings provide evidence-based guidelines for waterproofing system selection and installation quality control in wet zone applications.
References
AquaBlu Mosaics. (2024). 9 reasons why epoxy grout is the best for swimming pools. https://www.aquablumosaics.com/blogs/news/9-reasons-why-epoxy-grout-is-the-best-for-swimming-pools
Chew, M. Y. L. (2005). Defect analysis in wet areas of buildings. Construction and Building Materials, 19(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.07.005
Escudero, D. (2024, June 25). Epoxy grout vs. cement grout: Which is best for your pool? J Designs. https://www.jdesigns.com/blog/epoxy-vs-cement-grout-for-pool
European Committee for Standardization. (2017). EN 12004-1:2017. Adhesives for ceramic tiles — Part 1: Requirements, assessment and verification of constancy of performance, classification and marking. CEN. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/48998e72-43b4-4ab9-9385-a9399c2c4689/en-12004-1-2017?srsltid=AfmBOoqrKc1d6ZD_5J9kLygXjdybRCp5mn52ZPAyW68w3LBAg8gphinq
Francke, B., & Piekarczuk, A. (2020). Experimental Investigation of Adhesion Failure between Waterproof Coatings and Terrace Tiles under Usage Loads. Buildings, 10(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10030059
Jenni, A., Holzer, L., Zurbriggen, R., & Herwegh, M. (2005). Influence of polymers on microstructure and adhesive strength of cementitious tile adhesive mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.039
Michalak, J. (2021). Ceramic tile adhesives from the producer’s perspective: A literature review. Ceramics, 4(3), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4030027
Michalak, J., & Ziomek, R. (2023). Assessment of Cementitious Ceramic Tile Adhesives in the Light of Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Tensile Adhesion Strength Measurements. Materials, 16(12), 4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124245
Ohama, Y. (1995). Handbook of polymer-modified concrete and mortars: Properties and process technology. Noyes Publications. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Handbook-of-Polymer-Modified-Concrete-and-Mortars%3A-Ohama/de00c4d98baa27f21d7506fc8511f3a67723c7a2
PS Market Research. (2024). U.S. waterproofing market size & share forecast to 2030. https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/us-waterproofing-market
Rysin, V., & Montyka, Y. (2025). Otsinka efektyvnosti derzhavnykh prohram finansovoi pidtrymky biznesu v Ukraini [Assessment of the effectiveness of state financial support programmes for business in Ukraine]. Sustainable Development of Economy, 4(51), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2024-51-36 (in Ukrainian)
Schulze, J., & Killermann, O. (2001). Long-term performance of redispersible powders in mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(3), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00498-1
Strilets, V., Frolov, S., Datsenko, V., Tymoshenko, O., & Yatsko, M. (2022). State support for the digitalization of SMEs in European countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(4), 290–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(4).2022.22
Sundakov, A. (2024). Post-war reconstruction and disaster recovery: Lessons for Ukraine. International Economic Policy, 2(41), 65–79. https://www.doi.org/10.33111/iep.eng.2024.41.05
Syzon, V. (2025). Finansovi instrumenty pidtrymky biznesu: derzhavna prohrama “dostupni kredyty 5–7–9 %” [Financial instruments for business support: State program “Affordable loans 5–7–9%”]. Current Issues in Modern Science, 12(42), 500–511. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2025-12(42)-500-511 (in Ukrainian)
Weber Saint-Gobain. (2023). Grouting in swimming pool, spa and sauna: Application guidelines. https://www.th.weber/en/tile-grout/grouting-swimming-pool-spa-and-sauna
Wetzel, A., Herwegh, M., Zurbriggen, R., & Winnefeld, F. (2012a). Influence of shrinkage and water transport mechanisms on microstructure and crack formation of tile adhesive mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.07.007
Wetzel, A., Zurbriggen, R., Herwegh, M., Greminger, A., & Kaufmann, J. (2012b). Long-term study on failure mechanisms of exterior applied tilings. Construction and Building Materials, (37), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.072
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Kuchinka Veniamin